requestId:684c3e36712043.02312114.
Read and discussion on Wang Yangming’s “Unification of Knowledge and Action” during the period of the People’s Republic of ChinaBaobao Message Board Competition
Author: Le Aiguo (Specially Produced by Zhuzi Research Institute, Shangpin Teachers’ Model College, former professor of the Department of Philosophy and Doctoral Supervisor)
Source: “Lanzhou Journal” Issue 8, 2020
Abstract:The interpretation of Wang Yangming’s “integration of knowledge and action” during the period has been based on the reading of Wang Yangming’s “unity of knowledge and action” in the country, Thanks to the perspective of understanding and ethics represented by Wuliang’s “Yangming School” deepens the understanding of the inseparable relationship between knowledge and behavior; there is also the perspective of mind-nature theory represented by Liang Shuming’s “Yangming School”” highlighting Wang Yangming’s “Knowledge” The most basic foundation of the unity of action; there is also the interpretation from the perspective of the theory and understanding of the mind and nature, represented by Liang Qichao’s “The Teachings of Wang Yangming’s Integration of Knowledge and Action” and Jo Lin’s “New Discussion on the Unification of Knowledge and Action”, which has set a precedent for a comprehensive interpretation of Wang Yangming’s “Unification of Knowledge and Action”. The main reason is that studying the differences in the “unity of knowledge and action” of Wang Yangming during the period will help clarify the ideological development process from Wang Yangming’s “unity of knowledge and action” to the ancients’ “unity of knowledge and action”.
RelatedBaoqiang.com VIP Keywords:Everyone in the international era; Wang Yangpeng; unity of knowledge and action; thank you indefinitely; Liang Shuming; Liang Qichao
“Understanding knowledge and action” is the main concept of Yangming, and it has been highly valued by contemporary scholars. The discussions are unabashed and the discussions are becoming more and more profound. However, these discussions only have literary data that settled in Yangming, and have not paid enough attention to the academic research results of many students in Japan, and have not made a systematic review of Wang Yangming’s “integration of knowledge and action” based on later generations’ interpretation of Wang Yangming’s “unity of knowledge and action”, so they lack the required academic foundation. href=”https://twsharestory.com/”>investigation software has so many of them are just low-level repetitions. Although there are sometimes new concepts, they are difficult to break down in a practical way. In fact, during the period of the People’s Republic of China, Wang Yangming’s “unity of knowledge and action” had formed several divergent solutions. There were both interpretations from the perspective of cognitive theory and ethics, as well as interpretations from the perspective of mind-nature intrinsic theory, as well as interpretations from the perspective of mind-nature intrinsic theory and understanding intrinsic theory, and they all had major impacts. These divergent interpretations should become the basis for a step-by-step research in today’s academic research.
1. Reading from the perspective of cognitive theory and ethics
Wang Yangming said “the unity of knowledge and action”, saying: “The real and realistic meaning of knowledge is action;The cleverness of action is to know, and the skill of knowledge and action cannot be achieved. …The nature of knowledge and action is like this. “1 talks about “the body of knowledge and action is like this.” He also said: “The body of knowledge and action is like this. “2” The knowledge and action section is also like this. “3 Important is to talk about “integration of knowledge and action” from the perspective of the nature of mind. However, by the late Qing Dynasty, many scholars began to understand Wang Yangming’s “integration of knowledge and action” from the perspective of cognitive theory and ethics. Kang Yousheng said: “Wang Yang understood the “integration of knowledge and action” as a kind of person, which is like eating bitter melon, seeing the bitterness and knowing. Those who must eat and know before knowing are united in knowledge and action. ”4 It is believed that Wang Yangming’s “integration of knowledge and action” is about how to know and how to know. Zhang Taiyan believed that Wang Yangming’s “integration of knowledge and action” was originally written by Cheng, and also said: “Cheng said: ‘People must truly understand and start to develop in action. Just like a person ate a tiger, his face will change suddenly when he hears it. Even if it has not been eaten, even though it knows that the tiger is fearful and the face is free of sound. Everyone also knows that roe is a sweet deed, but people say their name and have a favorable deed, but the savages do not. The same is true for students to know. If it is strong in line with the Tao, even if it is practiced, it will not be able to last forever. Human nature is good, and it is smooth to follow the principles and act, so it is clear and you will do it with your own heart. ’Case: This is the beginning of the unity of knowledge and action. “5 It is obviously a discussion of Wang Yangming’s “unity of knowledge and action” with Cheng’s “knowing first and then” in a relationship. In fact, “knowing first and then” separates knowledge and action, which is equivalent to what Wang Yangming calls “the original body of knowledge and action is this way” and “the section of knowledge and action is also originally like this.” Cai Yuanpei, published in 1910 When discussing Wang Yangming’s “unity of knowledge and action”, he quoted what he said, “knowledge is the beginning of action, and action is the accomplishment of knowledge”, “there is the reality of knowledge and the clarity of action is knowledge”, and pointed out: “What Yangming says is to use the wisdom of virtue and nature, and it is different from what he always says; and what he says is to act, as what “Big Learning” means. However, knowing and doing things immediately is not just talking. ”6 Here, Wang Yang understands the “knowledge” of “unity of knowledge and action” as “virtue” and “action” as “movement”; the “virtue” of human beings should be manifested in the movement of human beings’ behavior, “knowing and action are done”. But no matter what, in Cai Yuanpei’s view, knowledge and action are different, and the two should be combined into one.
1 Xie Wuliang’s “Yangming School” published in 1915 is the first Yangming School of Research and Development in the National Period. Chapter 3 of the book “The Combination of Knowledge and Action” divides the modern relationship between knowledge and action into: first, knowing and action, second, knowing and action, third, doing first, knowing and knowing; and says: “What Yangming calls ‘the unity of knowledge and action’ means knowing and action together, regardless of the order. “Yang Ming used the second statement of “integration of knowledge and action” to take the first and third statements and compromise. “7 Thanks for his infinite belief, Wang Yangming said that “knowledge and action are united. Song Wei was laid off and returned to her hometown. His relatives immediately introduced her to her. “As a compromise between prophets and action, he said that although there is a difference between knowledge and action, they must go hand in hand, regardless of order. They should combine the two into one. He also combined Wang Yangming’s meaning of “knowledge and action” into ten aspects: “1. Knowledge must be done”; “2. Knowledge and action”3. Do not because you know it is not true”; “4. True knowledge must be implemented”; “5. Do not be able to obtain true knowledge at all”; “6. Knowing is fantasy, and behavior is real, and truth must be real”; “7. Knowing is a rational theory, behavior is practical, and theory is valuable and non-reasonable because it is suitable for reality and non-determined”; “8. The unity of knowledge and action is the essence of the relationship between knowledge and action”; “9. The unity of knowledge and action can encourage the courage and courage of reality”; “10. The unity of knowledge and action is not limited to action, but also refers to the thoughts of the mind.” 8 He also said: “As for the scope of ‘integration of knowledge and action’, it is limited to human affairs, not as far as the natural world. Any political morality, and everything related to human affairs, will do it if you know it; it is rare for you to know it and do it immediately. Therefore, Yang clearly stated that “knowledge and action are united”, and he always focused on reality and was also dedicated to human affairs. “9 In Xie Wuliang’s opinion, Wang Yangming’s “unity of knowledg
發佈留言